![]() Their legacy is one of cruelty, chaos, and cost-transference to the rest of society. Where in this whole cycle of abuse and unethical business practices is anyone who deserves the title of “responsible business owner?” These “business owners” are charlatans, their Conservation arguments hocus pocus, their carnival barking just a distraction. Opponents of this legislation cannot rely on Conservation arguments, because no reputable advocate for the species believes that excessive breeding of animals of unknown genetic background helps restore tigers or lions in their habitats thousands of miles away. So why not solve the problem on the front end and stop people from putting juvenile tigers and lions into this dangerous and cruel situation in the first place? ![]() This is an unfunded mandate on a small, non-profit business (that’s what rescue organizations are). They are too big to handle after that, and that’s why the operators must keep breeding tigers and lions to keep a fresh supply in the pipeline.Įach tiger or lion thrust into that world costs an animal welfare group as much as a million dollars over the course of the animal’s lifetime. Any one of them might trigger a Zanesville-like incident to recur at any one of the facilities with one or more captive carnivores and a deficit of proper protocols and sound housing.Īnd for what? So someone can pet a tiger cub for 10 minutes and the roadside zoo owner can pocket the fee for this form of exploitation?Ĭub petting as a business strategy lasts just a few months for each animal. Pick your cause for a dangerous-animals-at-large scenario: Tornado, derecho, troubled owner, vandal, disgruntled employee cutting a hole in a fence. Sheriffs’ deputies were ordered to shoot the animals for public safety purposes. Sheriffs and other first responders do not want to confront a 350-pound tiger when they rush in to stop a fire, attend to medical injuries, or interrupt a domestic dispute.Ī decade earlier, another emotionally troubled exotic animal owner in Zanesville, Ohio released 50 exotic animals, including grizzly bears, wolves, and big cats, into the community just before dusk. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., Mike Garcia, R-Calif., Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz., and 227 additional House cosponsors, seeks to stop the trade in big cats as pets, including breeding the animals for cub-petting opportunities by paying customers.Īnimal welfare groups and law enforcement agencies know all too well the fate of animals conscripted into this trade. House of Representatives should take note of those facts as it takes up the Big Cat Public Safety Act (BCPSA), H.R. Department of Justice for his own alleged animal violations. Indiana’s Tim Stark and South Carolina’s “Doc” Antle are now facing criminal charges for mistreatment of animals, while Joe’s business partner, Jeff Lowe, faces civil charges from the U.S. But what’s new is that Joe’s exotic-animal brethren, also featured in the series, may be close on his heels when it comes to trouble with the law. The series ended with Joe Maldonado – aka “Joe Exotic” – staring out at us from federal prison after convicted in a murder-for-hire scheme and a tiger-killing spree. ![]() ![]() But now, six months after Netflix released the episodes for binge-watching, there’s much that’s been clarified about the big-cat owners. In a nation driven indoors last spring by COVID-19, home-viewing of “Tiger King” became a rage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |